Glezer: 15 firms breached BetStop, only 3 ever fined
Consumer advocate Adam Glezer says just three firms have ever been fined despite 15 breaching Australia’s self-exclusion register.
The hit
Consumer advocate Adam Glezer says 15 wagering firms have breached Australia’s BetStop self-exclusion rules, but only three have ever been fined, according to a report by his firm Consumer Champion. Entain allegedly breached the rules 500 times without penalty because the ACMA’s probe overran its 12-month statutory limit, he told SBC News.
Why it matters
BetStop is meant to lock problem gamblers out of every licensed operator, but Glezer argues weak enforcement turns fines into a cost of doing business rather than a deterrent. He also flags Dataworks board member Ian Penrose, who also sits on Playtech’s board, calling it a conflict of interest Dataworks disputes.
The record
| Unibet BetStop breaches | Over 100,000 alleged breaches, cost it $1m according to Glezer |
|---|---|
| Entain BetStop breaches | 500 alleged breaches, no fine as ACMA probe exceeded 12-month limit (Glezer) |
| Dabble penalty | $1.1m ACMA settlement, third-ever BetStop fine, issued as of this report |
| Public awareness of BetStop | 26.5% of Australian adults aware register exists (AIFS) |
| Dataworks share price | AU$6.43 at 2017 IPO, now AU$0.12 |
| Dataworks FY26 loss | $2.25m (£1.2m) statutory loss after tax, down from $10.03m in FY25 |
What happens next
Watch for further ACMA settlement orders & whether Dataworks’ governance holds up once Penrose leaves the board by December 2026.
Sources: Are cracks starting to show in Australia’s BetStop scheme?
Named in this story? Reply to [email protected] & we publish it.
18+. Betting involves risk. If gambling is a problem for you or someone close to you, help is available.



Discussion
Ask a question, add useful context or share a source. Keep it relevant & respectful.
Comments are reviewed before publication.