Churchill Downs & NYRA move to kill ‘rigged pools’ RICO case

Defendants say horseplayers can’t prove the alleged scheme cost them any money.

The hit

Churchill Downs, the New York Racing Association & The Stronach Group are fighting a proposed class action alleging they rigged pari-mutuel pools to favour computer-assisted wagering operations over ordinary bettors. Seven horseplayers claim a racketeering scheme, using rebates, superior infrastructure access & late-pool bet dumping, tilted odds against retail punters, according to court filings.

Why it matters

Pari-mutuel odds move as money enters the pool, so any edge in speed or access changes what ordinary bettors actually get paid out. The defendants argue odds are set by hundreds or thousands of individual bettors, not the tracks, & say the plaintiffs have not shown any specific losing payout was caused by the alleged scheme. They liken the rebates to airline miles rather than an unfair edge. If proven, the case could force tracks to rethink rebate deals with high-volume operations that currently drive much of their wagering revenue.

The record

Case filed by	7 horseplayers (plaintiffs)
Defendants named	Wagering tech firms named alongside the three tracks
Legal basis	Federal RICO Act claims
Defendants’ motion	Filed this week, seeking dismissal
Venue	US District Court, Eastern District of New York

What happens next

Watch for the New York federal judge’s ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss, which will decide whether the RICO claims proceed to discovery.

Sources: Churchill Downs, NYRA Fight ‘Rigged’ Horse Betting Pools RICO Lawsuit

Named in this story? Reply to [email protected] & we publish it.

18+. Betting involves risk. If gambling is a problem for you or someone close to you, help is available.