AGA, NFL & 39 states back New Jersey’s Kalshi Supreme Court bid
A decision on whether to hear the case comes first, with a full ruling, if granted, likely to follow.
The hit
The American Gaming Association has filed a Supreme Court brief backing New Jersey’s bid to enforce its gaming laws against Kalshi’s sports event contracts. The petition challenges a Third Circuit ruling in Kalshi’s favour, according to CasinoBeats.
Why it matters
If the Third Circuit ruling stands, the AGA says prediction markets could keep offering sports-linked contracts nationwide without the state licensing, tax or consumer-protection rules that bind sportsbooks, in its view. A Supreme Court review could reset that balance, affecting how Kalshi & rivals compete with licensed operators & whether states or federal regulators control the product.
The record
| Petitioner | New Jersey, seeking Supreme Court review |
|---|---|
| AGA’s brief | argues prediction-market sports contracts function as sports betting without state safeguards |
| State backing | a bipartisan group of 39 state attorneys general, led by Ohio’s Andy Wilson, filed in support |
| League backing | NFL filed in support, citing game-integrity concerns |
| Core legal question | whether Dodd-Frank & the Commodity Exchange Act override state gambling law |
| Timeline | if the Supreme Court grants review, a full ruling would likely come sometime in 2027 |
What happens next
Watch for the Supreme Court’s decision on whether to grant review of New Jersey’s petition.
Sources: Sports Betting Rules Face Supreme Court Test Over Kalshi Contracts – CasinoBeats
Named in this story? Reply to newsdesk@infobets.com & we publish it.
18+. Betting involves risk. If gambling is a problem for you or someone close to you, help is available.





Discussion
Ask a question, add useful context or share a source. Keep it relevant & respectful.
Add a comment
Comments are reviewed before publication.