Skip to content
Gibraltar
Wire

Sections

Alerts

What do you want to understand?

REGULATION 60-second read

Fantasy loophole beats 15-state ban on college player bets

Published: 2 min read
An empty college basketball arena at dawn, seats bare, court lit from above.

Analysts found nearly 21,000 opportunities to bet on individual March Madness players, most via fantasy sites not sportsbooks.

The hit

Daily fantasy platforms are letting bettors wager on individual college athletes in states that explicitly ban the practice, according to the Shirley Povich Center & Howard Center for Investigative Journalism. The loophole meant state bans applied to just 38% of opportunities to bet on individual athletes during men’s March Madness. Over 120 million Americans, including 82 million in states with no legal sports betting, could still legally stake money on college players.

Why it matters

Harassment of college athletes by bettors who lose money is among the reasons 15 states ban prop bets on individual players. Because fantasy platforms are excluded from the legal definition of a wager, pick ’em sites can offer parlay-style bets on individual players without tripping state gambling law. For bettors, it means the product looks & functions like a prop bet, while some fantasy operators have faced cease-&-desist letters or restarted as peer-to-peer contests after regulators pushed back.

The record

States banning college player props 15 (Shirley Povich Center & Howard Center analysis)
Share of March Madness prop bets covered by bans 38% (Povich Center & Howard Center)
Prop-like opportunities on PrizePicks, Underdog, Sleeper & DraftKings Pick6 over 11,500 during men’s March Madness (Povich Center & Howard Center)
Americans able to bet on college athletes despite bans over 120 million, including 82 million in states with no legal sports betting (Povich Center & Howard Center)
Arkansas action against PrizePicks & Underdog cease-&-desist letters sent, early 2024 (Arkansas regulators)

What happens next

Watch state regulators, including California & Arkansas, who have already scrutinised pick ’em platforms, for signs of further action against the sites.

Sources: More than a dozen states ban this kind of sports wager — except when they don’t

Named in this story? Reply to newsdesk@infobets.com & we publish it.

18+. Betting involves risk. If gambling is a problem for you or someone close to you, help is available.

Discussion

Ask a question, add useful context or share a source. Keep it relevant & respectful.

Add a comment

Comments are reviewed before publication.

Your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked .

The InfoBets Brief

A clearer view.
Once a week.

Three useful reads & one takeaway. Betting, padel & industry information, every Friday at 12:00 Gibraltar time. Free.

Read the Brief

We will email a confirmation link before subscribing you. Privacy policy.

The InfoBets Brief

Three useful reads & one takeaway, every Friday at 12:00 Gibraltar time. Free.

Or get the Brief on Telegram, every Friday:

Get the Brief on Telegram

Read the latest Brief